Environmental justice research and activism predominantly focus on openly conflictive situations; claims making is central. However, situations of injustice can still occur even if there is no overt conflict.Environmental Justice and Soy Agribusinessfills this gap by applying an environmental justice incommensurabilities framework to reveal the mechanisms of why conflicts do not arise in particular situations, even though they fall within classic environmental justice schemes.

Empirically, the case study focus is on the remote soy frontier in Northwest Argentina, particularly the town of Las Lajitas as the nucleus of soy production. This represents an excellent example of the recent expansion of the soy agribusiness industry in Latin America. First, a classic environmental justice analysis is carried out. Second, and drawing on the epistemological works of Ludwik Fleck, an alternative analytical framework is proposed, visualising locals' thought styles on change, effects and potential conflict in relation to soy agribusiness. Here, visceral elements and the application of a jazz methodology are vital for a more holistic form of multisensory cognition. Third, incommensurabilities among the classic and alternative approach are uncovered, arguing for the importance of temporal and spatial contexts in environmental justice research.

环境正义的研究和活动主要集中在公开的冲突情况上；提出要求是核心。然而，即使没有公开的冲突，不公正的情况也会发生。《环境正义与大豆农业》通过应用环境正义的不相称性框架，揭示了在特定情况下冲突不会发生的机制，尽管它们属于典型的环境正义方案，从而填补了这个空白。

在经验上，案例研究的重点是阿根廷西北部偏远的大豆边境地区，特别是作为大豆生产核心的Las Lajitas镇。这代表了最近拉丁美洲大豆农业综合产业扩张的一个很好的例子。首先，进行了一个典型的环境正义分析。其次，借鉴Ludwik Fleck的认识论作品，提出了一个替代的分析框架，将当地人对大豆农业综合企业的变化、影响和潜在冲突的思维方式可视化。在这里，内脏元素和爵士乐方法的应用对于更全面的多感官认知形式至关重要。第三，经典方法和替代方法之间的不相称性被揭示出来，论证了环境正义研究中时间和空间背景的重要性。