国家战略研究中心-地缘政治与被忽视的北极空间(英).pdf
The 2017 U.S. National Security Strategy takes its point of departure in the growing political, economic, and military competition the United States is facing around the world, to include from Russia and China—and aims to prevent any region of the world from becoming dominated by a single power. While the Arctic has been characterized more by cooperation than competition, recent events indicate that the tides may be turning. As attention turns north and the Arctic reenters the strategic calculations of great powers, spaces that have been largely neglected are suddenly assuming a position of significance, forcing countries in the region to consider how to balance competing interests from outside powers.
The essays below illustrate how it looks when three such places—Svalbard, Norway; Greenland; and Iceland—find themselves caught between competing powers. While this attention has taken different forms, there are similarities between the cases. All three, for example, have received economic interest from China and are beginning to feel the pressure of Russia’s military build-up in the Arctic. All three are also part of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and anchor their defense policies in that alliance.
At the same time, each of these places faces unique conditions that limit their ability to pursue truly independent security and defense policies. In the case of Svalbard, the 1957 Svalbard Treaty grants Norway sovereignty over the island but also affords third countries certain rights. In the case of Greenland, an autonomous region that is part of the Kingdom of Denmark, it has control over domestic issues, but the Danish government retains control of foreign affairs and defense. Finally, in the case of Iceland, the absence of its own standing military makes it reliant on the United States and NATO for its defense. Such conditions are an increasing challenge as these three places struggle to respond to the interest of external actors while also maintaining their sovereignty.
相关报告
美国智库7万字报告:中美科技战与数字治国实践(中英文版)
8490
类型:国际关系
上传时间:2021-08
标签:中美、科技战、地缘政治)
语言:中英
金额:15元
美国智库2.4万字报告:欧洲、美国、亚洲和新的1914年风险(中英对照)
6882
类型:国际关系
上传时间:2022-06
标签:国际组织、地缘政治)
语言:中英
金额:5元
欧洲智库2.7万字报告:2022年的世界:决定国际议程的十大问题(中英文版)
4923
类型:国际关系
上传时间:2022-01
标签:地缘政治、国际局势)
语言:中英
金额:10元
世界经济论坛1.2万字报告:全球首席经济学家2023展望(中英对照)
4459
类型:宏观
上传时间:2023-01
标签:全球经济、2023展望、地缘政治)
语言:中英
金额:3元
高盛1.3万字报告:2024年美国经济展望(中英对照)
4221
类型:宏观
上传时间:2023-11
标签:美国经济、通货膨胀、地缘政治)
语言:中英
金额:5元
世界经济论坛1.2万字报告:首席经济学家展望2024年1月(中英对照)
4007
类型:宏观
上传时间:2024-01
标签:地缘政治、生成式人工智能、经济分化)
语言:中英
金额:3元
经济学人智库:2024年全球经济面临的十大关键风险情景(中英对照)
3749
类型:宏观
上传时间:2023-11
标签:全球经济、风险情景、地缘政治)
语言:中英
金额:3元
顶级咨询机构3万字报告:地缘政治与全球贸易几何结构(中英对照)
3735
类型:国际关系
上传时间:2024-02
标签:地缘政治、贸易结构、产品集中度)
语言:中英
金额:7元
LAZARD国际投行1.2万字报告:2024年全球经济展望(中英对照)
3453
类型:宏观
上传时间:2023-11
标签:全球经济、地缘政治、货币信贷)
语言:中英
金额:5元
新技术和数据的地缘政治影响建议报告(英)
3250
类型:国际关系
上传时间:2021-06
标签:新技术、数据、地缘政治)
语言:英文
金额:5积分
积分充值
30积分
6.00元
90积分
18.00元
150+8积分
30.00元
340+20积分
68.00元
640+50积分
128.00元
990+70积分
198.00元
1640+140积分
328.00元
微信支付
余额支付
积分充值
应付金额:
0 元
请登录,再发表你的看法
登录/注册