微信扫一扫联系客服

微信扫描二维码

进入报告厅H5

关注报告厅公众号

134

如何设计欧盟级的天然气短缺应急计划?行为经济学、政策研究和以往经验的证据(英)-2022.8

# 欧盟 # 天然气 # 行为经济学 大小:0.45M | 页数:18 | 上架时间:2022-09-01 | 语言:英文

如何设计欧盟级的天然气短缺应急计划?行为经济学、政策研究和以往经验的证据(英)-2022.8.pdf

如何设计欧盟级的天然气短缺应急计划?行为经济学、政策研究和以往经验的证据(英)-2022.8.pdf

试看9页

类型: 行研

上传者: XR0209

出版日期: 2022-08-31

摘要:

Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the risk of a prolonged physical supply shortage of nat-ural gas is higher than ever before. While European Union (EU) institutions and member states are discussing the possibility of imposing an embargo or a gradual phase out in this sector, an abrupt shortage may result from a political decision on the supplier’s side. This event would be beyond EU control and requires appropriate contingency plans. However, the EU does not have adequate procedures for managing long-term supply interruptions. High gas prices alone will not be able to deliver the necessary level of savings, and they will also create unfair distribution of reserves.

EU’s preparedness and resilience rests on its ability to adjust gas demand quickly, efficiently and in a fair manner. With gas rationing as the measure of last resort, we propose to develop non-price-based mechanisms, as well as coordinated and voluntary efforts for gas saving on a Euro-pean level. To increase resilience and unlock gas saving potential across sectors, the following steps are recommended: • European institutions and governments should immediately agree on an EU level gas saving target with a clear definition of the contribution expected from each member state. This will allow to reduce imports and support storage refill.

• Building on the initial saving arrangements and experience with their implementation, the EU should be prepared to scale up the gas savings targets for the case of supply interruptions. This may include more far-reaching non-price mechanisms, potent enough to avoid the need for rationing.

• To prepare for the case of rationing as a measure of last resort should savings targets and storage refill levels not be met, there is a need of multi-stakeholder advance planning and consultations.

This process needs to be launched immediately, and must be based on broad stakeholder par-ticipation, to safeguard legitimacy of demand adjustment as well as fair burden sharing. In this policy brief, we outline the way such a process could unfold, and show the potential of non-price mechanisms to trigger savings, using historical examples from other sectors. We also argue for the need to create a special Taskforce at EU level to coordinate the planning and implementation of contingency plans.

展开>> 收起<<

请登录,再发表你的看法

登录/注册

XR0209

相关报告

更多

浏览量

(134)

下载

(0)

收藏

分享

购买

5积分

0积分

原价5积分

VIP

*

投诉主题:

  • 下载 下架函

*

描述:

*

图片:

上传图片

上传图片

最多上传2张图片

提示

取消 确定

提示

取消 确定

提示

取消 确定

积分充值

选择充值金额:

30积分

6.00元

90积分

18.00元

150+8积分

30.00元

340+20积分

68.00元

640+50积分

128.00元

990+70积分

198.00元

1640+140积分

328.00元

微信支付

余额支付

积分充值

填写信息

姓名*

邮箱*

姓名*

邮箱*

注:填写完信息后,该报告便可下载

选择下载内容

全选

取消全选

已选 1