微信扫一扫联系客服

微信扫描二维码

进入报告厅H5

关注报告厅公众号

194

新经济思想研究所-应对欧洲能源危机(英)-2022.9

# 欧洲 # 能源危机 # 2022 大小:1.46M | 页数:41 | 上架时间:2022-09-11 | 语言:英文

新经济思想研究所-应对欧洲能源危机(英)-2022.9.pdf

新经济思想研究所-应对欧洲能源危机(英)-2022.9.pdf

试看10页

类型: 行研

上传者: 智释雯

撰写机构: 新经济思想研究所

出版日期: 2022-09-11

摘要:

Economies across Europe face unprecedented energy-economic challenges, with cost-ofliving/inflation impacts which hold the prospect of turning into major social and political crises. 

In the UK, without any intervention, total household consumer expenditure on energy is set to  rise from £64bn in 2021 to around £200bn – an increase exceeding defense and education  expenditures combined. This is dominated by expenditure on electricity and gas, split (on  average) roughly equally between the two. Energy costs are a prime factor driving general  inflation in the UK to at least 10%, whilst poor households face cost-of-living increases of  almost 20%. 

The proximate causes – a Covid-recovery surge of global demand relative to supply in global gas  markets, followed by the Russian invasion of Ukraine - are well known. In addition, the  unprecedented heatwaves and drought across Europe – in line with the expected foothills of  accelerating climate change - have curtailed output from nuclear and hydro sources, adding  further pressure to electricity prices even aside from other more direct impacts of the extreme  weather. 

However, underlying these proximate causes is the generalized application in energy of an  economic principle of marginal cost pricing, far beyond its appropriate limits. This principle which in energy markets could be more precisely termed short-run-marginal-cost-on-all pricing means that fossil fuels still predominantly set the wholesale price of electricity, which over the  past eighteen months, has risen from around £50/MWh to around £200/MWh.1 At the same time,  European electricity systems are in the midst of a transition from the internationally traded  commodity of fossil fuels, to mainly domestic assets – notably, renewable energy sources. 

Aside from the cost and distributional consequences, such an approach to pricing is also  demonstrably inappropriate for driving investment in non-fossil fuel assets; indeed, it is  obscuring the growing success of a transition which has seen rapidly rising volumes of  increasingly cheap renewable energy. The UK in 2013 initiated a system of long-term fixedprice (“CfD”) contracts for renewables. The initial rounds combined cheaper onshore wind &  solar with less mature & hence more expensive offshore & biomass energy, but the investment  stimulated huge cost reductions particularly in offshore wind. The large offshore windfarms  coming onstream this year cost around £70/MWh, and the subsequent contracts for offshore  wind – agreed in 2019 and 2022 for delivery in the next few years – cost around £46/MWh and  £38/MWh respectively. 

The result is a striking ‘cost inversion’. Such sources, based on contracts outside the market,  offer power at under a quarter of current and projected wholesale electricity prices. They presage  a future of predominantly non-fossil, asset-based electricity with entirely different economic (as  well as environmental) characteristics. Aside from the proximate causes, navigating the crisis by exploiting this transition is the fundamental task facing policymakers. 

展开>> 收起<<

请登录,再发表你的看法

登录/注册

智释雯

相关报告

更多

浏览量

(131)

下载

(3)

收藏

分享

购买

5积分

0积分

原价5积分

VIP

*

投诉主题:

  • 下载 下架函

*

描述:

*

图片:

上传图片

上传图片

最多上传2张图片

提示

取消 确定

提示

取消 确定

提示

取消 确定

积分充值

选择充值金额:

30积分

6.00元

90积分

18.00元

150+8积分

30.00元

340+20积分

68.00元

640+50积分

128.00元

990+70积分

198.00元

1640+140积分

328.00元

微信支付

余额支付

积分充值

填写信息

姓名*

邮箱*

姓名*

邮箱*

注:填写完信息后,该报告便可下载

选择下载内容

全选

取消全选

已选 1