Notable takeaways from this year’s survey include the following: • For the first time since the PPS began fifteen years ago, the possibility of a foreign terrorist organization inflicting a mass-casualty attack on the United States or a treaty ally was not proposed as a plausible contingency for the coming year. The 9/11 era, when foreign terrorist-related threats dominated the results of the PPS, appears to be over. The possibility of a highly disruptive cyberattack targeting U.S. critical infrastructure by a state or nonstate actor remains the top homeland security concern.
• The majority of Tier I contingencies now concern either potential flashpoints involving the major powers (e.g., a cross-strait crisis around Taiwan, escalation of the war in Ukraine, and instability in Russia) or nuclear weapons development by Iran and North Korea. The risk of the United States becoming embroiled in a military confrontation with either China or Russia (and conceivably both simultaneously) has risen. Although no Tier I contingency was judged to be very likely in 2023, it is still sobering that each was given an even chance of occurring.
• PPS respondents define what matters to U.S. interests much more narrowly than in recent years. Not since 2017 have there been so few Tier I priorities—seven in total. Two contingencies that warranted this ranking last year, Afghanistan and Venezuela, are now judged to be Tier II concerns, while Haiti and Lebanon have slipped to Tier III—even though conditions in those countries have either deteriorated or not changed significantly in the interim. Furthermore, over half of all the contingencies surveyed in the 2023 PPS now qualify as Tier III priorities—an unprecedented number. Even though the majority were judged to have an even chance of occurring, the likely impact of most on U.S. interests was assessed to be low. Tier III contingencies include three involving countries selected by the Joe Biden administration to receive special attention and long-term U.S. foreign assistance under the 2019 Global Fragility Act (GFA)—Haiti, Libya, and Mozambique. (The other two GFA priorities—Papua New Guinea and coastal West Africa—were not even proposed for the 2023 PPS.)
相关报告
吐血翻译6万字!美国兰德最新报告:中国的大战略(中英对照)
10w+
类型:国际关系
上传时间:2020-08
标签:中美
语言:中英
金额:10元
吐血翻译11万字!美国智库报告:美国与中、俄竞争的战略选择(中英对照)
8.3w+
类型:国际关系
上传时间:2020-09
标签:战略竞争
语言:中英
金额:10元
已翻译!乌克兰生物实验室文件6. 利沃夫区样本销毁
5.8w+
类型:国际关系
上传时间:2022-03
标签:生物实验室
语言:中文
金额:免费
吐血整理5.4万字!德国智库:欧洲对华政策:可能走向日益紧张的局面(中英对照)
4.1w+
类型:国际关系
上传时间:2020-10
标签:对华政策
语言:中英
金额:10元
400项政策建议!美国众议院报告:中国是本世纪最大的挑战(中英对照)
3.9w+
类型:国际关系
上传时间:2020-11
标签:对华报告
语言:中英
金额:18.8元
刚刚美国参议院通过283页涉华法案《2021年战略竞争法案》(中英对照全文)
3.8w+
类型:国际关系
上传时间:2021-04
标签:战略竞争法案
语言:中英
金额:18元
中美双方2+2对话的全文(中英双语)
3.7w+
类型:国际关系
上传时间:2021-03
标签:对话
语言:中英
金额:免费
吐血翻译8万字!特朗普的四年:美国与世界的变化
3.1w+
类型:国际关系
上传时间:2020-10
标签:中美
语言:中英
金额:10元
重磅!美国发布中国南海军事能力报告
3.0w+
类型:国际关系
上传时间:2020-08
标签:军力报告
语言:英文
金额:免费
美智库最新报告:美国对华正处于愤怒阶段! (中英对照)
2.9w+
类型:国际关系
上传时间:2020-09
标签:中美
语言:中英
金额:10元
积分充值
30积分
6.00元
90积分
18.00元
150+8积分
30.00元
340+20积分
68.00元
640+50积分
128.00元
990+70积分
198.00元
1640+140积分
328.00元
微信支付
余额支付
积分充值
应付金额:
0 元
请登录,再发表你的看法
登录/注册