微信扫一扫联系客服

微信扫描二维码

进入报告厅H5

关注报告厅公众号

198

国际投行报告-中国网贷服务行业-2021年第三季度的稳健和2022年第一季度的政策催化剂将推动股市走高-2021.11.16-29页

# 中国网贷服务行业 # 2021Q3 # 投行报告 大小:1.22M | 页数:29 | 上架时间:2021-11-23 | 语言:英文

国际投行报告-中国网贷服务行业-2021年第三季度的稳健和2022年第一季度的政策催化剂将推动股市走高-2021.11.16-29页.pdf

国际投行报告-中国网贷服务行业-2021年第三季度的稳健和2022年第一季度的政策催化剂将推动股市走高-2021.11.16-29页.pdf

试看10页

类型: 行研

上传者: XR0209

出版日期: 2021-11-16

摘要:

Loan facilitators under our coverage reported decent earnings in 3Q21 and provided more detailed plans on business process modifications to be in compliant with the latest regulations.

We believe potential PBOC approval of some of the new business procedures in 1Q22 could be a catalyst.

Healthy 3Q21 earnings trend for loan facilitators under our coverage despite concerns on regulations and macro uncertainty. QFIN, LU and LX all reported healthy loan volume and stable credit quality trends. Take rate declined modestly at LX due to efforts to reduce IRR on facilitated loans to below 24% by June 2022 but slightly higher for QFIN. While we do expect some profit pressure in 2022 for QFIN and LX, as they shift their borrower bases and take a more prudent strategy on loan volume during the early stages of their new business cooperation model with credit scoring firms, we believe the lower risk profile of the new borrower base could reduce earnings volatility in the future with still reasonable net take rates of around 3%.

Business process modification to be compliant with credit scoring regulations could be approved by PBOC as early as 1Q22. Management of QFIN, LU and LX all outlined work plan schedules to comply with new credit reporting rules, the final regulatory change, and expect to seek PBOC approval in 1Q22. The firms will test different types of cooperation model with licensed credit score agencies with a key difference centered around where the joint risk modeling process will be housed including 1) solely at credit score agencies, 2) separate models at loan facilitators and credit score agencies, and 3) separate models at credit score agencies and financial firms built and maintained by loan facilitators. We believe option 2 is the most likely option. While the first option is less favorable to loan facilitators, they could still maintain the key value proposition, which includes the combination of client acquisition, risk screening, borrower reactivation and other post lending services for small financial firms, and loan facilitators could still effectively turn that into option 3, which would give them a greater value proposition. We believe QFIN and LU are better positioned on the regulatory front with LX facing more of a challenge.

展开>> 收起<<

请登录,再发表你的看法

登录/注册

XR0209

相关报告

更多

浏览量

(113)

下载

(4)

收藏

分享

购买

5积分

0积分

原价5积分

VIP

*

投诉主题:

  • 下载 下架函

*

描述:

*

图片:

上传图片

上传图片

最多上传2张图片

提示

取消 确定

提示

取消 确定

提示

取消 确定

积分充值

选择充值金额:

30积分

6.00元

90积分

18.00元

150+8积分

30.00元

340+20积分

68.00元

640+50积分

128.00元

990+70积分

198.00元

1640+140积分

328.00元

微信支付

余额支付

积分充值

填写信息

姓名*

邮箱*

姓名*

邮箱*

注:填写完信息后,该报告便可下载

选择下载内容

全选

取消全选

已选 1