微信扫一扫联系客服

微信扫描二维码

进入报告厅H5

关注报告厅公众号

176

国际投行报告-全球投资策略-中国的监管重置:全球溢出效应-2021.9.29-27页

# 中国的监管重置 # 全球溢出效应 # 投行报告 大小:0.88M | 页数:27 | 上架时间:2021-10-12 | 语言:英文

国际投行报告-全球投资策略-中国的监管重置:全球溢出效应-2021.9.29-27页.pdf

国际投行报告-全球投资策略-中国的监管重置:全球溢出效应-2021.9.29-27页.pdf

试看10页

类型: 策略

上传者: ZF报告分享

撰写机构: 摩根士丹利

出版日期: 2021-09-29

摘要:

As the current Chinese production shutdowns show, China's regulatory reset could have major consequences and possibly global spillovers. In our base case, the global headwinds are modest, but a faster pace of regulatory tightening will be more serious.

What China's regulatory reset means for its economy: A profound policy shift is under way in China, and policy-makers have initiated a far-reaching and wideranging regulatory tightening cycle. In the near term, production cuts in order to comply with energy intensity targets, slower property activity and near-term funding pressures for property developers will be a significant drag on growth, though there could be at least some offset by policy easing. In this report, we focus more on the medium-term implications and examine the global spillovers.

For China, its regulatory reset will weigh on corporate sentiment and in our assessment lead to slower investment and productivity growth. In our base case, we adjust our 2022-25 GDP forecast down by 40bp to 4.6%Y per annum.

Which regions are most exposed: To analyse the spillover effects, we simulated it through a global input-output model. The results from our input-output analysis suggest that the drag on growth would be manageable in the base case scenario, with an overall drag on global GDP of 11bp. The economies which are most exposed are from Asia (especially Korea and Taiwan), followed by Europe, reflecting the close integration with China in the global supply chain networks.

Among the large economies, the US ranks as one of the least exposed economies in our analysis. Outside this group, Russia and Norway also rank among the top countries affected due to their role as key suppliers of mining and quarrying products.

As was the case with trade tensions, mind the indirect effects: While the inputoutput approach captures many spillovers, we are mindful that it could be only partial. During the tariff escalation from the US, weaker corporate confidence and tightening financial conditions weighed further on growth beyond the increase in tariffs. In our base case, other channels are likely to be small. In our bear case, other channels of transmission outside trade will be more active and in some cases large.

展开>> 收起<<

请登录,再发表你的看法

登录/注册

相关报告

更多

浏览量

(131)

下载

(4)

收藏

分享

购买

5积分

0积分

原价5积分

VIP

*

投诉主题:

  • 下载 下架函

*

描述:

*

图片:

上传图片

上传图片

最多上传2张图片

提示

取消 确定

提示

取消 确定

提示

取消 确定

积分充值

选择充值金额:

30积分

6.00元

90积分

18.00元

150+8积分

30.00元

340+20积分

68.00元

640+50积分

128.00元

990+70积分

198.00元

1640+140积分

328.00元

微信支付

余额支付

积分充值

填写信息

姓名*

邮箱*

姓名*

邮箱*

注:填写完信息后,该报告便可下载

选择下载内容

全选

取消全选

已选 1